Choose a half dozen or so theories that you have studied as a Term Paper

Choose a half dozen or so theories that you have analyze as a psychology student. Describe how these theories differ from unity another, or how they are similar to one another - Term Paper ExampleI came to know that my understanding and knowledge of those theories was not the and one. There are some different aspects of those theories, which I never came across. I came to know that how their relativity and chemical group are irrelevant and how some of them are astonishingly interrelated. Some of those theories, which made me a victim of cognitive dissonance, are given below.I will start with some basic theories. Classical conditioning and operative Conditioning falls under the same group of theories. It is obvious that they are similar thats why they belong to the same group. But if we take a closer look, we will find that they have short in common. Although apparently they look same. Classical conditioning deals with stimulus evoking a reaction. Operant conditioning on the other slew deals with improving of discourage a behavior. When I take a look at these two theories under the light of Aristotles four hastens, I found that they very differently attend the causes. For example the final cause of classical conditioning is to evoke a reaction or receipt to a stimulus. This reaction will most probably out of control of the subject. On the other hand operant conditioning encourages a subject to exhibit a certain behavior to have iterate or to stay away from the punishment. Now this encouragement to exhibit certain type of behavior is all told in the control of the subject. Subject might chose to act otherwise. These theories are over again different in respondent efficient cause. In classical conditioning the efficient cause is a stimulus, an event or a thing that evokes a reaction. On the other hand operant conditioning answer efficient cause with a reward or punishment. A reward cannot evoke a reaction. These two theories have light in common in f ormal cause. Both theories share behavior including physical action, but again a reaction is not deliberate. On the other hand a behavior for a reward will be deliberate. They might have something in